What are the chances of seeing a Blue-winged Teal in Bahía de Loreto National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Blue-winged Teal sighting in Bahía de Loreto National Park on a given day, based on 78 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 78th most-seen of the 169 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Blue-winged Teal in Bahía de Loreto National Park?
January–April and August–November
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Blue-winged Teal in Bahía de Loreto National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May–July and December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Blue-winged Teal?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Blue-winged Teal sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Bahía de Loreto National Park the best place to see a Blue-winged Teal?
17th of 62
Of the 62 parks where we can rate Blue-winged Teal sightings, Bahía de Loreto National Park ranks 17th at about 10%. The best odds are in Elk Island National Park (Canada, about 60%), Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge (United States, about 50%) and Palo Verde National Park (Costa Rica, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Blue-winged Teal live in Bahía de Loreto National Park?
Same genus: Spatula
The closest relatives of the Blue-winged Teal that you can see in Bahía de Loreto National Park (genus Spatula, Shovelers and Allies) are Cinnamon Teal (about 10%) and Northern Shoveler (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Blue-winged Teal sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Blue-winged Teal is recorded against all the birds logged in Bahía de Loreto National Park (78 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.