What are the chances of seeing a Painted Stork in Bandhavgarh National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Painted Stork sighting in Bandhavgarh National Park on a given day, based on 110 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 113th most-seen of the 241 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Painted Stork in Bandhavgarh National Park?
June
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Painted Stork in Bandhavgarh National Park on a given day, against under 5% in July and September–February, the lowest months. That is one of Bandhavgarh National Park's wettest months, with about 150 mm of rain against almost none in November.
What time of day is best to see a Painted Stork?
Between 3 and 6 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Painted Stork sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Bandhavgarh National Park the best place to see a Painted Stork?
11th of 14
Of the 14 parks where we can rate Painted Stork sightings, Bandhavgarh National Park ranks 11th at about 10%. The best odds are in Keoladeo National Park (India, about 80%), Yala National Park (Sri Lanka, about 80%) and Wilpattu National Park (Sri Lanka, about 70%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Painted Stork live in Bandhavgarh National Park?
Same family: Ciconiidae
The closest relatives of the Painted Stork that you can see in Bandhavgarh National Park (family Ciconiidae, Storks) are Lesser Adjutant (about 40%) and Asian Woolly-necked Stork (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Painted Stork sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Painted Stork is recorded against all the birds logged in Bandhavgarh National Park (110 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.