What are the chances of seeing a Plum-headed Parakeet in Bandhavgarh National Park?
Very likely
About 70% of wildlife watchers report a Plum-headed Parakeet sighting in Bandhavgarh National Park on a given day, based on 1,814 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 6th most-seen of the 241 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Plum-headed Parakeet in Bandhavgarh National Park?
January and October
In those months about 80% of wildlife watchers report a Plum-headed Parakeet in Bandhavgarh National Park on a given day, against about 50% in June to September, the lowest months. Those are among Bandhavgarh National Park's driest months, with about 25 mm of rain a month against 400 mm in August.
What time of day is best to see a Plum-headed Parakeet?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Plum-headed Parakeet sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Bandhavgarh National Park the best place to see a Plum-headed Parakeet?
Yes
Of the 17 parks where we can rate Plum-headed Parakeet sightings, Bandhavgarh National Park has the highest daily chance: about 70%. Next come Mudumalai National Park (India, about 60%) and Satpura National Park (India, about 60%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Plum-headed Parakeet live in Bandhavgarh National Park?
Same genus: Psittacula
The closest relatives of the Plum-headed Parakeet that you can see in Bandhavgarh National Park (genus Psittacula, Old World Parakeets) are Rose-ringed Parakeet (about 70%) and Alexandrine Parakeet (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Plum-headed Parakeet sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Plum-headed Parakeet is recorded against all the birds logged in Bandhavgarh National Park (1,814 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.