What are the chances of seeing a Pacific-slope Flycatcher in Banff National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Pacific-slope Flycatcher sighting in Banff National Park on a given day, based on 113 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 91st most-seen of the 191 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Pacific-slope Flycatcher in Banff National Park?
June and July
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Pacific-slope Flycatcher in Banff National Park on a given day, against under 5% in August to May, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Pacific-slope Flycatcher?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Pacific-slope Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Banff National Park the best place to see a Pacific-slope Flycatcher?
19th of 25
Of the 25 parks where we can rate Pacific-slope Flycatcher sightings, Banff National Park ranks 19th at under 5%. The best odds are in Redwood National Park (United States, about 20%), Pacific Rim National Park Reserve (Canada, about 20%) and Olympic National Park (United States, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Pacific-slope Flycatcher live in Banff National Park?
Same genus: Empidonax
The closest relatives of the Pacific-slope Flycatcher that you can see in Banff National Park (genus Empidonax, Empidonax Flycatchers) are Willow Flycatcher (about 10%) and Least Flycatcher (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Pacific-slope Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Pacific-slope Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Banff National Park (113 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.