What are the chances of seeing a Scarce Copper in Biebrza National Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Scarce Copper sighting in Biebrza National Park on a given day, based on 15 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 18th most-seen of the 97 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 60%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Scarce Copper in Biebrza National Park?
July
In that month about 60% of wildlife watchers report a Scarce Copper in Biebrza National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March–May and September, the lowest months. That is one of Biebrza National Park's wettest months, with about 95 mm of rain against 35 mm in March. December has too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Scarce Copper?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Scarce Copper sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Biebrza National Park the best place to see a Scarce Copper?
6th of 15
Of the 15 parks where we can rate Scarce Copper sightings, Biebrza National Park ranks 6th at about 30%. The best odds are in Hohe Tauern National Park (Austria, about 50%), Mercantour National Park (France, about 50%) and Vanoise National Park (France, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Scarce Copper live in Biebrza National Park?
Same genus: Lycaena
The closest relatives of the Scarce Copper that you can see in Biebrza National Park (genus Lycaena, Lycaena butterflies) are Small Copper (about 20%) and Purple-Shot Copper (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Scarce Copper sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Scarce Copper is recorded against all the insects logged in Biebrza National Park (15 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.