What are the chances of seeing an Oculate Dancer in Braulio Carrillo National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Oculate Dancer sighting in Braulio Carrillo National Park on a given day, based on 19 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 117th most-seen of the 378 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Oculate Dancer in Braulio Carrillo National Park?
June
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report an Oculate Dancer in Braulio Carrillo National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January, April, August and October, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Oculate Dancer?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Oculate Dancer sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Braulio Carrillo National Park the best place to see an Oculate Dancer?
11th of 16
Of the 16 parks where we can rate Oculate Dancer sightings, Braulio Carrillo National Park ranks 11th at about 10%. The best odds are in Brownsberg Nature Park (Suriname, about 30%), Pico Bonito National Park (Honduras, about 20%) and Chagres National Park (Panama, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Oculate Dancer live in Braulio Carrillo National Park?
Same genus: Argia
The closest relatives of the Oculate Dancer that you can see in Braulio Carrillo National Park (genus Argia, Dancers) are Green-Eyed Dancer (about 10%), Varied Dancer (about 10%) and Dusky Dancer (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Oculate Dancer sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Oculate Dancer is recorded against all the insects logged in Braulio Carrillo National Park (19 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.