What are the chances of seeing a Rufous Songlark in Cape Range?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous Songlark sighting in Cape Range on a given day, based on 13 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 80th most-seen of the 84 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Rufous Songlark in Cape Range?
June
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous Songlark in Cape Range on a given day, against under 5% in March–May and July–January, the lowest months. That is one of Cape Range's wettest months, with about 55 mm of rain against almost none in October. February has too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Rufous Songlark?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Rufous Songlark sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Cape Range the best place to see a Rufous Songlark?
5th of 9
Of the 9 parks where we can rate Rufous Songlark sightings, Cape Range ranks 5th at under 5%. The best odds are in Uluru-Kata Tjuta National Park (Australia, about 40%), Hattah-Kulkyne National Park (Australia, about 10%) and Flinders Ranges National Park (Australia, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Rufous Songlark live in Cape Range?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Rufous Songlark that you can see in Cape Range (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Pied Butcherbird (about 70%), Singing Honeyeater (about 60%) and Western Bowerbird (about 50%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Rufous Songlark sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Rufous Songlark is recorded against all the birds logged in Cape Range (13 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.