What are the chances of seeing a Scarce Copper in Cévennes National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Scarce Copper sighting in Cévennes National Park on a given day, based on 96 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 83rd most-seen of the 996 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Scarce Copper in Cévennes National Park?
July and August
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Scarce Copper in Cévennes National Park on a given day, against under 5% in September to May, the lowest months. Those are among Cévennes National Park's driest months, with about 45 mm of rain a month against 260 mm in October.
What time of day is best to see a Scarce Copper?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Scarce Copper sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Cévennes National Park the best place to see a Scarce Copper?
12th of 15
Of the 15 parks where we can rate Scarce Copper sightings, Cévennes National Park ranks 12th at about 20%. The best odds are in Hohe Tauern National Park (Austria, about 50%), Mercantour National Park (France, about 50%) and Vanoise National Park (France, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Scarce Copper live in Cévennes National Park?
Same genus: Lycaena
The closest relatives of the Scarce Copper that you can see in Cévennes National Park (genus Lycaena, Lycaena butterflies) are Small Copper (about 30%) and Purple-Shot Copper (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Scarce Copper sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Scarce Copper is recorded against all the insects logged in Cévennes National Park (96 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.