Psittacula cyanocephala
Silhouette: Farelli (photo), John E. McCormack, Michael G. Harvey, Brant C. Faircloth, Nicholas G. Crawford, Travis C. Glenn, Robb T. Brumfield & T. Michael Keesey · PhyloPic
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~30%
The plum-headed parakeet (Psittacula cyanocephala) is a species of parakeet in the family Psittacidae. It is endemic to the Indian subcontinent and was once thought to be conspecific with the blossom-headed parakeet (P. roseata) before being elevated to a full species. Plum-headed parakeets are found in flocks, the males having a pinkish purple head and the females, a grey head. They fly swiftly with twists and turns accompanied by their distinctive calls.
In 1760 the French zoologist Mathurin Jacques Brisson included a description of the plum-headed parakeet in his Ornithologie based on a specimen collected in India. He used the French name Le perruche a teste bleu and the Latin name Psittaca cyanocephalos. Although Brisson coined Latin names, these do not conform to the binomial system and are not recognised by the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. When in 1766 the Swedish naturalist Carl Linnaeus updated his Systema Naturae for the twelfth edition he added 240 species that had been previously described by Brisson. One of these was the plum-headed parakeet. Linnaeus included a terse description, coined the binomial name Psittacus cyanocephalus and... Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bandhavgarh National Park | 🇮🇳 India | |
| 2 | Mudumalai National Park | 🇮🇳 India | |
| 3 | Satpura National Park | 🇮🇳 India | |
| 4 | Jim Corbett National Park | 🇮🇳 India | |
| 5 | Nagarhole National Park | 🇮🇳 India | |
| 6 | Kanha National Park | 🇮🇳 India | |
| 7 | Ranthambore National Park | 🇮🇳 India | |
| 8 | Royal Bardia National Park | 🇳🇵 Nepal | |
| 9 | Chitwan National Park | 🇳🇵 Nepal | |
| 10 | Gir National Park | 🇮🇳 India | |
| 11 | Bandipur National Park | 🇮🇳 India | |
| 12 | Periyar National Park | 🇮🇳 India | |
| 13 | Udawalawe National Park | 🇱🇰 Sri Lanka | |
| 14 | Sinharaja Forest Reserve | 🇱🇰 Sri Lanka | |
| 15 | Eravikulam National Park | 🇮🇳 India | |
| 16 | Yala National Park | 🇱🇰 Sri Lanka | |
| 17 | Keoladeo National Park | 🇮🇳 India |
| # | Zoo / Centre | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Disney's Animal Kingdom | 🇺🇸 United States | |
| 2 | Islamabad Zoo | 🇵🇰 Pakistan | |
| 3 | Wildlife World Zoo | 🇺🇸 United States | |
| 4 | Paignton Zoo | 🇬🇧 United Kingdom | |
| 5 | Kamla Nehru Prani Sangrahalay | 🇮🇳 India | |
| 6 | Budapest Zoo & Botanical Garden | 🇭🇺 Hungary | |
| 7 | Paphos Zoo | 🇨🇾 Cyprus | |
| 8 | Loro Parque | 🇪🇸 Spain | |
| 9 | Adelaide Zoo | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 10 | Kuala Lumpur Bird Park | 🇲🇾 Malaysia | |
| 11 | Ranger Red’s Zoo & Conservation Park | 🇦🇺 Australia |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Plum-headed Parakeet sighting in Bhopal on a given day, based on 52 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 105th most-seen of the 197 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
October
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Plum-headed Parakeet in Bhopal on a given day, against under 5% in July and November–May, the lowest months. That is one of Bhopal's driest months, with about 30 mm of rain against 440 mm in July.
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Plum-headed Parakeet sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
15th of 39
Of the 39 cities where we can rate Plum-headed Parakeet sightings, Bhopal ranks 15th at about 10%. The best odds are in Dehradun (India, about 40%), Thrissur (India, about 30%) and Indore (India, about 20%).
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Plum-headed Parakeet is recorded against all the birds logged in Bhopal (52 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
