What are the chances of seeing an Orangetip Angled-Sulphur in Rio de Janeiro?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Orangetip Angled-Sulphur sighting in Rio de Janeiro on a given day, based on 41 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 16th most-seen of the 169 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Orangetip Angled-Sulphur in Rio de Janeiro?
November
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report an Orangetip Angled-Sulphur in Rio de Janeiro on a given day, against under 5% in January–February and September, the lowest months. That is one of Rio de Janeiro's wettest months, with about 220 mm of rain against 40 mm in August.
What time of day is best to see an Orangetip Angled-Sulphur?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Orangetip Angled-Sulphur sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Rio de Janeiro the best place to see an Orangetip Angled-Sulphur?
6th of 10
Of the 10 cities where we can rate Orangetip Angled-Sulphur sightings, Rio de Janeiro ranks 6th at about 10%. The best odds are in Belém (Brazil, about 20%), São Luís (Brazil, about 20%) and Recife (Brazil, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Orangetip Angled-Sulphur live in Rio de Janeiro?
Same family: Pieridae
The closest relatives of the Orangetip Angled-Sulphur that you can see in Rio de Janeiro (family Pieridae, Whites, Yellows, and Sulphurs) are Great Southern White (about 10%) and Orange-Barred Sulphur (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Orangetip Angled-Sulphur sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Orangetip Angled-Sulphur is recorded against all the insects logged in Rio de Janeiro (41 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.