What are the chances of seeing a Streak-chested Antpitta in Corcovado National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Streak-chested Antpitta sighting in Corcovado National Park on a given day, based on 286 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 131st most-seen of the 332 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Streak-chested Antpitta in Corcovado National Park?
June and September
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Streak-chested Antpitta in Corcovado National Park on a given day, against under 5% in October, the lowest month.
What time of day is best to see a Streak-chested Antpitta?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Streak-chested Antpitta sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Corcovado National Park the best place to see a Streak-chested Antpitta?
3rd of 11
Of the 11 parks where we can rate Streak-chested Antpitta sightings, Corcovado National Park ranks 3rd at about 10%. The best odds are in Carara National Park (Costa Rica, about 20%) and Soberanía National Park (Panama, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Streak-chested Antpitta live in Corcovado National Park?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Streak-chested Antpitta that you can see in Corcovado National Park (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Chestnut-backed Antbird (about 60%), Black-hooded Antshrike (about 60%) and Riverside Wren (about 50%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Streak-chested Antpitta sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Streak-chested Antpitta is recorded against all the birds logged in Corcovado National Park (286 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.