What are the chances of seeing a Black-faced Antthrush in Corcovado National Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Black-faced Antthrush sighting in Corcovado National Park on a given day, based on 985 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 21st most-seen of the 332 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 70%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black-faced Antthrush in Corcovado National Park?
February–April and June–July
In those months about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Black-faced Antthrush in Corcovado National Park on a given day, against about 10% in October, the lowest month.
What time of day is best to see a Black-faced Antthrush?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black-faced Antthrush sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Corcovado National Park the best place to see a Black-faced Antthrush?
Among the best
Of the 26 parks where we can rate Black-faced Antthrush sightings, Corcovado National Park ranks 2nd at about 30%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Tambopata National Reserve (Peru, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Black-faced Antthrush live in Corcovado National Park?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Black-faced Antthrush that you can see in Corcovado National Park (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Chestnut-backed Antbird (about 60%), Black-hooded Antshrike (about 60%) and Riverside Wren (about 50%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black-faced Antthrush sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black-faced Antthrush is recorded against all the birds logged in Corcovado National Park (985 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.