What are the chances of seeing a Crowned Slaty Flycatcher in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Crowned Slaty Flycatcher sighting in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve on a given day, based on 22 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 206th most-seen of the 328 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Crowned Slaty Flycatcher in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve?
June and August–September
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Crowned Slaty Flycatcher in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve on a given day, against under 5% in July and October–May, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Crowned Slaty Flycatcher?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Crowned Slaty Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve the best place to see a Crowned Slaty Flycatcher?
7th of 10
Of the 10 parks where we can rate Crowned Slaty Flycatcher sightings, Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve ranks 7th at under 5%. The best odds are in El Impenetrable National Park (Argentina, about 20%), Yasuní National Park (Ecuador, about 10%) and Iberá National Park (Argentina, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Crowned Slaty Flycatcher live in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Crowned Slaty Flycatcher that you can see in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Tropical Kingbird (about 50%), Lesser Kiskadee (about 50%) and Great Kiskadee (about 50%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Crowned Slaty Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Crowned Slaty Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve (22 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.