What are the chances of seeing a Chestnut-bellied Euphonia in Iguaçu National Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Chestnut-bellied Euphonia sighting in Iguaçu National Park on a given day, based on 1,291 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 34th most-seen of the 346 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 70%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Chestnut-bellied Euphonia in Iguaçu National Park?
January–February, April–May and August
In those months about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Chestnut-bellied Euphonia in Iguaçu National Park on a given day, against about 20% in November and December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Chestnut-bellied Euphonia?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Chestnut-bellied Euphonia sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Iguaçu National Park the best place to see a Chestnut-bellied Euphonia?
3rd of 5
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Chestnut-bellied Euphonia sightings, Iguaçu National Park ranks 3rd at about 30%. The best odds are in Serra dos Órgãos National Park (Brazil, about 40%) and Iguazú National Park (Argentina, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Chestnut-bellied Euphonia live in Iguaçu National Park?
Same genus: Euphonia
The closest relatives of the Chestnut-bellied Euphonia that you can see in Iguaçu National Park (genus Euphonia, Typical Euphonias) are Purple-throated Euphonia (about 40%) and Violaceous Euphonia (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Chestnut-bellied Euphonia sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Chestnut-bellied Euphonia is recorded against all the birds logged in Iguaçu National Park (1,291 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.