What are the chances of seeing a Blue-naped Chlorophonia in Iguaçu National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Blue-naped Chlorophonia sighting in Iguaçu National Park on a given day, based on 441 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 101st most-seen of the 346 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Blue-naped Chlorophonia in Iguaçu National Park?
May and July–October
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Blue-naped Chlorophonia in Iguaçu National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February, the lowest month.
What time of day is best to see a Blue-naped Chlorophonia?
Between noon and 3 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Blue-naped Chlorophonia sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Iguaçu National Park the best place to see a Blue-naped Chlorophonia?
4th of 13
Of the 13 parks where we can rate Blue-naped Chlorophonia sightings, Iguaçu National Park ranks 4th at about 10%. The best odds are in Serra dos Órgãos National Park (Brazil, about 30%), Amboró National Park (Bolivia, about 20%) and Iguazú National Park (Argentina, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Blue-naped Chlorophonia live in Iguaçu National Park?
Same family: Fringillidae
The closest relatives of the Blue-naped Chlorophonia that you can see in Iguaçu National Park (family Fringillidae, Finches, Euphonias, and Allies) are Purple-throated Euphonia (about 40%), Chestnut-bellied Euphonia (about 30%) and Violaceous Euphonia (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Blue-naped Chlorophonia sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Blue-naped Chlorophonia is recorded against all the birds logged in Iguaçu National Park (441 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.