What are the chances of seeing a Black Woodpecker in Fertő-Hanság National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Black Woodpecker sighting in Fertő-Hanság National Park on a given day, based on 91 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 110th most-seen of the 207 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black Woodpecker in Fertő-Hanság National Park?
October
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Black Woodpecker in Fertő-Hanság National Park on a given day, against under 5% in July–August and November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Black Woodpecker?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black Woodpecker sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Fertő-Hanság National Park the best place to see a Black Woodpecker?
11th of 19
Of the 19 parks where we can rate Black Woodpecker sightings, Fertő-Hanság National Park ranks 11th at about 10%. The best odds are in Białowieża National Park (Poland, about 50%), Bavarian Forest National Park (Germany, about 20%) and Triglav National Park (Slovenia, about 20%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Black Woodpecker live in Fertő-Hanság National Park?
Same family: Picidae
The closest relatives of the Black Woodpecker that you can see in Fertő-Hanság National Park (family Picidae, Woodpeckers) are Great Spotted Woodpecker (about 30%), Green Woodpecker (about 20%) and Syrian Woodpecker (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black Woodpecker sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black Woodpecker is recorded against all the birds logged in Fertő-Hanság National Park (91 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.