What are the chances of seeing a Pacific-slope Flycatcher in Glacier National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Pacific-slope Flycatcher sighting in Glacier National Park on a given day, based on 227 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 80th most-seen of the 174 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Pacific-slope Flycatcher in Glacier National Park?
June to August
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Pacific-slope Flycatcher in Glacier National Park on a given day, against under 5% in September to May, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Pacific-slope Flycatcher?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Pacific-slope Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Glacier National Park the best place to see a Pacific-slope Flycatcher?
13th of 25
Of the 25 parks where we can rate Pacific-slope Flycatcher sightings, Glacier National Park ranks 13th at about 10%. The best odds are in Redwood National Park (United States, about 20%), Pacific Rim National Park Reserve (Canada, about 20%) and Olympic National Park (United States, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Pacific-slope Flycatcher live in Glacier National Park?
Same genus: Empidonax
The closest relatives of the Pacific-slope Flycatcher that you can see in Glacier National Park (genus Empidonax, Empidonax Flycatchers) are Willow Flycatcher (about 20%), Hammond's Flycatcher (about 20%) and Dusky Flycatcher (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Pacific-slope Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Pacific-slope Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Glacier National Park (227 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.