What are the chances of seeing a Red-Lined Looper in Grampians National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Red-Lined Looper sighting in Grampians National Park on a given day, based on 10 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 83rd most-seen of the 148 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Red-Lined Looper in Grampians National Park?
April
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Red-Lined Looper in Grampians National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March, May–September and November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Red-Lined Looper?
Between 8 and 11 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Red-Lined Looper sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Grampians National Park the best place to see a Red-Lined Looper?
5th of 8
Of the 8 parks where we can rate Red-Lined Looper sightings, Grampians National Park ranks 5th at about 10%. The best odds are in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park (Australia, about 20%), Great Otway National Park (Australia, about 10%) and Booderee National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Red-Lined Looper live in Grampians National Park?
Same family: Geometridae
The closest relatives of the Red-Lined Looper that you can see in Grampians National Park (family Geometridae, Geometer Moths) are Apple Looper (about 10%), Plantain Moth (about 10%) and Fine-Lined Heath Moth (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Red-Lined Looper sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Red-Lined Looper is recorded against all the insects logged in Grampians National Park (10 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.