What are the chances of seeing an Australian Plague Locust in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Australian Plague Locust sighting in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 35th most-seen of the 61 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Australian Plague Locust in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park?
August
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report an Australian Plague Locust in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park on a given day, against under 5% in July and September–February, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Australian Plague Locust?
Between noon and 3 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Australian Plague Locust sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Hattah-Kulkyne National Park the best place to see an Australian Plague Locust?
2nd of 3
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Australian Plague Locust sightings, Hattah-Kulkyne National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%. The best odds are in Flinders Ranges National Park (Australia, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Australian Plague Locust live in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park?
Same family: Acrididae
The closest relatives of the Australian Plague Locust that you can see in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park (family Acrididae, Short-horned Grasshoppers) are Bark-Mimicking Grasshopper (about 20%) and Spur-Throated Locust (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Australian Plague Locust sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Australian Plague Locust is recorded against all the insects logged in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.