What are the chances of seeing a Spur-Throated Locust in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Spur-Throated Locust sighting in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 43rd most-seen of the 61 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Spur-Throated Locust in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park?
April–May and August
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Spur-Throated Locust in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park on a given day, against under 5% in June–July and September–February, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Spur-Throated Locust?
Between noon and 3 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Spur-Throated Locust sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Hattah-Kulkyne National Park the best place to see a Spur-Throated Locust?
2nd of 4
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Spur-Throated Locust sightings, Hattah-Kulkyne National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%. The best odds are in Flinders Ranges National Park (Australia, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Spur-Throated Locust live in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park?
Same family: Acrididae
The closest relatives of the Spur-Throated Locust that you can see in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park (family Acrididae, Short-horned Grasshoppers) are Bark-Mimicking Grasshopper (about 20%) and Australian Plague Locust (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Spur-Throated Locust sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Spur-Throated Locust is recorded against all the insects logged in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.