What are the chances of seeing a Bark-Mimicking Grasshopper in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Bark-Mimicking Grasshopper sighting in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park on a given day, based on 15 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 12th most-seen of the 61 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 60%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Bark-Mimicking Grasshopper in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park?
November and December
In those months about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Bark-Mimicking Grasshopper in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January–March, May–June and August, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Bark-Mimicking Grasshopper?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Bark-Mimicking Grasshopper sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Hattah-Kulkyne National Park the best place to see a Bark-Mimicking Grasshopper?
2nd of 7
Of the 7 parks where we can rate Bark-Mimicking Grasshopper sightings, Hattah-Kulkyne National Park ranks 2nd at about 20%. The best odds are in Uluru-Kata Tjuta National Park (Australia, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Bark-Mimicking Grasshopper live in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park?
Same family: Acrididae
The closest relatives of the Bark-Mimicking Grasshopper that you can see in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park (family Acrididae, Short-horned Grasshoppers) are Australian Plague Locust (about 10%) and Spur-Throated Locust (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Bark-Mimicking Grasshopper sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Bark-Mimicking Grasshopper is recorded against all the insects logged in Hattah-Kulkyne National Park (15 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.