What are the chances of seeing a Gold-Bordered Hairstreak in Iguazú National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Gold-Bordered Hairstreak sighting in Iguazú National Park on a given day, based on 9 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 204th most-seen of the 306 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Gold-Bordered Hairstreak in Iguazú National Park?
February and May
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Gold-Bordered Hairstreak in Iguazú National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April, June–July and September–January, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Gold-Bordered Hairstreak?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Gold-Bordered Hairstreak sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Iguazú National Park the best place to see a Gold-Bordered Hairstreak?
3rd of 5
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Gold-Bordered Hairstreak sightings, Iguazú National Park ranks 3rd at about 10%. The best odds are in Ría Lagartos Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 20%) and Lago de Yojoa (Honduras, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Gold-Bordered Hairstreak live in Iguazú National Park?
Same family: Lycaenidae
The closest relatives of the Gold-Bordered Hairstreak that you can see in Iguazú National Park (family Lycaenidae, Gossamer-winged Butterflies) are Separated Stripestreak (about 20%), Great Emesis (about 20%) and Cassius Blue (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Gold-Bordered Hairstreak sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Gold-Bordered Hairstreak is recorded against all the insects logged in Iguazú National Park (9 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.