What are the chances of seeing a Black-necked Stork in Jim Corbett National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Black-necked Stork sighting in Jim Corbett National Park on a given day, based on 169 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 150th most-seen of the 368 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black-necked Stork in Jim Corbett National Park?
November to May
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Black-necked Stork in Jim Corbett National Park on a given day, against under 5% in June to October, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Black-necked Stork?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black-necked Stork sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Jim Corbett National Park the best place to see a Black-necked Stork?
6th of 8
Of the 8 parks where we can rate Black-necked Stork sightings, Jim Corbett National Park ranks 6th at about 10%. The best odds are in Kaziranga National Park (India, about 70%), Keoladeo National Park (India, about 40%) and Kakadu National Park (Australia, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Black-necked Stork live in Jim Corbett National Park?
Same family: Ciconiidae
The closest relatives of the Black-necked Stork that you can see in Jim Corbett National Park (family Ciconiidae, Storks) are Black Stork (about 20%) and Asian Woolly-necked Stork (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black-necked Stork sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black-necked Stork is recorded against all the birds logged in Jim Corbett National Park (169 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.