What are the chances of seeing a Wallcreeper in Jim Corbett National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Wallcreeper sighting in Jim Corbett National Park on a given day, based on 93 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 194th most-seen of the 368 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Wallcreeper in Jim Corbett National Park?
November to January
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Wallcreeper in Jim Corbett National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February to October, the lowest months. Those are among Jim Corbett National Park's driest months, with about 20 mm of rain a month against 360 mm in July.
What time of day is best to see a Wallcreeper?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Wallcreeper sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Jim Corbett National Park the best place to see a Wallcreeper?
5th of 13
Of the 13 parks where we can rate Wallcreeper sightings, Jim Corbett National Park ranks 5th at under 5%. The best odds are in Gobi Gurvansaikhan National Park (Mongolia, about 40%), Picos de Europa National Park (Spain, about 10%) and Jiuzhaigou National Park (China, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Wallcreeper live in Jim Corbett National Park?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Wallcreeper that you can see in Jim Corbett National Park (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are White-cheeked Bulbul (about 60%), Jungle Babbler (about 60%) and Red-whiskered Bulbul (about 60%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Wallcreeper sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Wallcreeper is recorded against all the birds logged in Jim Corbett National Park (93 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.