What are the chances of seeing a Baglafecht Weaver in Kibale National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Baglafecht Weaver sighting in Kibale National Park on a given day, based on 135 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 144th most-seen of the 366 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Baglafecht Weaver in Kibale National Park?
October
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Baglafecht Weaver in Kibale National Park on a given day, against under 5% in June and November, the lowest months. That is one of Kibale National Park's wettest months, with about 140 mm of rain against 20 mm in February.
What time of day is best to see a Baglafecht Weaver?
Between 3 and 6 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Baglafecht Weaver sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Kibale National Park the best place to see a Baglafecht Weaver?
14th of 22
Of the 22 parks where we can rate Baglafecht Weaver sightings, Kibale National Park ranks 14th at about 10%. The best odds are in Aberdare National Park (Kenya, about 60%), Volcanoes National Park (Rwanda, about 60%) and Bale Mountains National Park (Ethiopia, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Baglafecht Weaver live in Kibale National Park?
Same genus: Ploceus
The closest relatives of the Baglafecht Weaver that you can see in Kibale National Park (genus Ploceus, Typical Weavers) are Vieillot's Weaver (about 50%), Black-necked Weaver (about 40%) and Village Weaver (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Baglafecht Weaver sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Baglafecht Weaver is recorded against all the birds logged in Kibale National Park (135 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.