What are the chances of seeing a Croaking Cisticola in Lake Mburo National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Croaking Cisticola sighting in Lake Mburo National Park on a given day, based on 53 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 215th most-seen of the 362 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Croaking Cisticola in Lake Mburo National Park?
December
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Croaking Cisticola in Lake Mburo National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January and March–October, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Croaking Cisticola?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Croaking Cisticola sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Lake Mburo National Park the best place to see a Croaking Cisticola?
15th of 21
Of the 21 parks where we can rate Croaking Cisticola sightings, Lake Mburo National Park ranks 15th at under 5%. The best odds are in Kidepo Valley National Park (Uganda, about 50%), Queen Elizabeth National Park (Uganda, about 20%) and Murchison Falls National Park (Uganda, about 20%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Croaking Cisticola live in Lake Mburo National Park?
Same genus: Cisticola
The closest relatives of the Croaking Cisticola that you can see in Lake Mburo National Park (genus Cisticola, Cisticolas) are Trilling Cisticola (about 60%), Tabora Cisticola (about 20%) and Winding Cisticola (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Croaking Cisticola sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Croaking Cisticola is recorded against all the birds logged in Lake Mburo National Park (53 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.