What are the chances of seeing a Singing Cisticola in Lake Mburo National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Singing Cisticola sighting in Lake Mburo National Park on a given day, based on 21 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 275th most-seen of the 362 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Singing Cisticola in Lake Mburo National Park?
October
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Singing Cisticola in Lake Mburo National Park on a given day, against under 5% in November to September, the lowest months. That is one of Lake Mburo National Park's wettest months, with about 95 mm of rain against 15 mm in July.
What time of day is best to see a Singing Cisticola?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Singing Cisticola sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Lake Mburo National Park the best place to see a Singing Cisticola?
15th of 18
Of the 18 parks where we can rate Singing Cisticola sightings, Lake Mburo National Park ranks 15th at under 5%. The best odds are in Nairobi National Park (Kenya, about 40%), Arusha National Park (Tanzania, about 30%) and Gorongosa National Park (Mozambique, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Singing Cisticola live in Lake Mburo National Park?
Same genus: Cisticola
The closest relatives of the Singing Cisticola that you can see in Lake Mburo National Park (genus Cisticola, Cisticolas) are Trilling Cisticola (about 60%), Tabora Cisticola (about 20%) and Winding Cisticola (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Singing Cisticola sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Singing Cisticola is recorded against all the birds logged in Lake Mburo National Park (21 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.