What are the chances of seeing a Holub's Golden-Weaver in Lake Mburo National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Holub's Golden-Weaver sighting in Lake Mburo National Park on a given day, based on 292 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 69th most-seen of the 362 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 60%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Holub's Golden-Weaver in Lake Mburo National Park?
August–September and November–December
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Holub's Golden-Weaver in Lake Mburo National Park on a given day, against about 10% in April, the lowest month.
What time of day is best to see a Holub's Golden-Weaver?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Holub's Golden-Weaver sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Lake Mburo National Park the best place to see a Holub's Golden-Weaver?
Yes
Of the 24 parks where we can rate Holub's Golden-Weaver sightings, Lake Mburo National Park has the highest daily chance: about 20%. Next come Nairobi National Park (Kenya, about 20%) and Akagera National Park (Rwanda, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Holub's Golden-Weaver live in Lake Mburo National Park?
Same genus: Ploceus
The closest relatives of the Holub's Golden-Weaver that you can see in Lake Mburo National Park (genus Ploceus, Typical Weavers) are Village Weaver (about 40%), Lesser Masked-Weaver (about 30%) and Spectacled Weaver (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Holub's Golden-Weaver sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Holub's Golden-Weaver is recorded against all the birds logged in Lake Mburo National Park (292 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.