What are the chances of seeing a Black Bulbul in Manas National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Black Bulbul sighting in Manas National Park on a given day, based on 243 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 103rd most-seen of the 377 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black Bulbul in Manas National Park?
February
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Black Bulbul in Manas National Park on a given day, against under 5% in October to December, the lowest months. That is one of Manas National Park's driest months, with about 40 mm of rain against 1070 mm in June.
What time of day is best to see a Black Bulbul?
Between 3 and 6 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black Bulbul sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Manas National Park the best place to see a Black Bulbul?
7th of 12
Of the 12 parks where we can rate Black Bulbul sightings, Manas National Park ranks 7th at about 20%. The best odds are in Royal Manas National Park (Bhutan, about 50%), Taroko National Park (Taiwan, about 30%) and Doi Inthanon National Park (Thailand, about 20%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Black Bulbul live in Manas National Park?
Same family: Pycnonotidae
The closest relatives of the Black Bulbul that you can see in Manas National Park (family Pycnonotidae, Bulbuls) are Red-whiskered Bulbul (about 50%), Black-crested Bulbul (about 40%) and Ashy-fronted Bearded Bulbul (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black Bulbul sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black Bulbul is recorded against all the birds logged in Manas National Park (243 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.