What are the chances of seeing a Chestnut-tailed Starling in Manas National Park?
Likely
About 40% of wildlife watchers report a Chestnut-tailed Starling sighting in Manas National Park on a given day, based on 752 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 15th most-seen of the 377 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 80%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Chestnut-tailed Starling in Manas National Park?
February
In that month about 70% of wildlife watchers report a Chestnut-tailed Starling in Manas National Park on a given day, against about 40% in March–May, August and October–January, the lowest months. That is one of Manas National Park's driest months, with about 40 mm of rain against 1070 mm in June.
What time of day is best to see a Chestnut-tailed Starling?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Chestnut-tailed Starling sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Manas National Park the best place to see a Chestnut-tailed Starling?
2nd of 23
Of the 23 parks where we can rate Chestnut-tailed Starling sightings, Manas National Park ranks 2nd at about 40%. The best odds are in Kaziranga National Park (India, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Chestnut-tailed Starling live in Manas National Park?
Same family: Sturnidae
The closest relatives of the Chestnut-tailed Starling that you can see in Manas National Park (family Sturnidae, Starlings) are Jungle Myna (about 50%), Indian Pied Starling (about 40%) and Common Hill Myna (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Chestnut-tailed Starling sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Chestnut-tailed Starling is recorded against all the birds logged in Manas National Park (752 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.