What are the chances of seeing a Holub's Golden-Weaver in Masai Mara National Reserve?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Holub's Golden-Weaver sighting in Masai Mara National Reserve on a given day, based on 166 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 182nd most-seen of the 398 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Holub's Golden-Weaver in Masai Mara National Reserve?
March–April, July and September–December
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Holub's Golden-Weaver in Masai Mara National Reserve on a given day, against under 5% in January–February, May–June and August, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Holub's Golden-Weaver?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Holub's Golden-Weaver sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Masai Mara National Reserve the best place to see a Holub's Golden-Weaver?
10th of 24
Of the 24 parks where we can rate Holub's Golden-Weaver sightings, Masai Mara National Reserve ranks 10th at about 10%. The best odds are in Lake Mburo National Park (Uganda, about 20%), Nairobi National Park (Kenya, about 20%) and Akagera National Park (Rwanda, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Holub's Golden-Weaver live in Masai Mara National Reserve?
Same genus: Ploceus
The closest relatives of the Holub's Golden-Weaver that you can see in Masai Mara National Reserve (genus Ploceus, Typical Weavers) are Village Weaver (about 20%), Spectacled Weaver (about 10%) and Baglafecht Weaver (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Holub's Golden-Weaver sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Holub's Golden-Weaver is recorded against all the birds logged in Masai Mara National Reserve (166 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.