What are the chances of seeing a Blue-Gray Satyr in Parque Natural Metropolitano?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Blue-Gray Satyr sighting in Parque Natural Metropolitano on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 71st most-seen of the 114 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Blue-Gray Satyr in Parque Natural Metropolitano?
February, June–August and November
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Blue-Gray Satyr in Parque Natural Metropolitano on a given day, against under 5% in March–May, September–October and December–January, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Blue-Gray Satyr?
Between 3 and 6 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Blue-Gray Satyr sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Parque Natural Metropolitano the best place to see a Blue-Gray Satyr?
14th of 15
Of the 15 parks where we can rate Blue-Gray Satyr sightings, Parque Natural Metropolitano ranks 14th at under 5%. The best odds are in Pico Bonito National Park (Honduras, about 20%), Main Ridge Forest Reserve (Trinidad and Tobago, about 20%) and Masaya Volcano National Park (Nicaragua, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Blue-Gray Satyr live in Parque Natural Metropolitano?
Same family: Nymphalidae
The closest relatives of the Blue-Gray Satyr that you can see in Parque Natural Metropolitano (family Nymphalidae, Brush-footed Butterflies) are Banded Peacock (about 20%), White Peacock (about 20%) and Tiger Longwing (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Blue-Gray Satyr sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Blue-Gray Satyr is recorded against all the insects logged in Parque Natural Metropolitano (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.