What are the chances of seeing a Chestnut-winged Cuckoo in Namdapha National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Chestnut-winged Cuckoo sighting in Namdapha National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 282nd most-seen of the 298 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Chestnut-winged Cuckoo in Namdapha National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Chestnut-winged Cuckoo in Namdapha National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season. June to September have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Chestnut-winged Cuckoo?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Chestnut-winged Cuckoo sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Namdapha National Park the best place to see a Chestnut-winged Cuckoo?
9th of 11
Of the 11 parks where we can rate Chestnut-winged Cuckoo sightings, Namdapha National Park ranks 9th at under 5%. The best odds are in Royal Manas National Park (Bhutan, about 10%), Cat Tien National Park (Vietnam, under 5%) and Kaeng Krachan National Park (Thailand, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Chestnut-winged Cuckoo live in Namdapha National Park?
Same family: Cuculidae
The closest relatives of the Chestnut-winged Cuckoo that you can see in Namdapha National Park (family Cuculidae, Cuckoos) are Green-billed Malkoha (about 10%) and Large Hawk Cuckoo (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Chestnut-winged Cuckoo sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Chestnut-winged Cuckoo is recorded against all the birds logged in Namdapha National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.