What are the chances of seeing a Black-necked Stork in Ranthambore National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Black-necked Stork sighting in Ranthambore National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 245th most-seen of the 251 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black-necked Stork in Ranthambore National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Black-necked Stork in Ranthambore National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Black-necked Stork?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black-necked Stork sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Ranthambore National Park the best place to see a Black-necked Stork?
8th of 8
Of the 8 parks where we can rate Black-necked Stork sightings, Ranthambore National Park ranks 8th at under 5%. The best odds are in Kaziranga National Park (India, about 70%), Keoladeo National Park (India, about 40%) and Kakadu National Park (Australia, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Black-necked Stork live in Ranthambore National Park?
Same family: Ciconiidae
The closest relatives of the Black-necked Stork that you can see in Ranthambore National Park (family Ciconiidae, Storks) are Asian Woolly-necked Stork (about 40%), Painted Stork (about 30%) and Asian Openbill Stork (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black-necked Stork sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black-necked Stork is recorded against all the birds logged in Ranthambore National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.