What are the chances of seeing a Jungle Babbler in Royal Manas National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Jungle Babbler sighting in Royal Manas National Park on a given day, based on 38 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 216th most-seen of the 388 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Jungle Babbler in Royal Manas National Park?
February, June and October–December
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Jungle Babbler in Royal Manas National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January, March–May and July, the lowest months. August and September have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Jungle Babbler?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Jungle Babbler sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Royal Manas National Park the best place to see a Jungle Babbler?
17th of 18
Of the 18 parks where we can rate Jungle Babbler sightings, Royal Manas National Park ranks 17th at under 5%. The best odds are in Keoladeo National Park (India, about 80%), Ranthambore National Park (India, about 80%) and Bandhavgarh National Park (India, about 70%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Jungle Babbler live in Royal Manas National Park?
Same family: Leiothrichidae
The closest relatives of the Jungle Babbler that you can see in Royal Manas National Park (family Leiothrichidae, Laughingthrushes and Allies) are Rufous-necked Laughingthrush (about 30%), White-crested Laughingthrush (about 30%) and Rufous Sibia (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Jungle Babbler sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Jungle Babbler is recorded against all the birds logged in Royal Manas National Park (38 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.