What are the chances of seeing a Fiery-necked Nightjar in Ruaha National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Fiery-necked Nightjar sighting in Ruaha National Park on a given day, based on 29 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 145th most-seen of the 276 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Fiery-necked Nightjar in Ruaha National Park?
November
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Fiery-necked Nightjar in Ruaha National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January–February and June, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Fiery-necked Nightjar?
Between 6 and 9 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Fiery-necked Nightjar sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Ruaha National Park the best place to see a Fiery-necked Nightjar?
5th of 29
Of the 29 parks where we can rate Fiery-necked Nightjar sightings, Ruaha National Park ranks 5th at about 10%. The best odds are in Kafue National Park (Zambia, about 20%), uMkhuze Game Reserve (South Africa, about 10%) and Hluhluwe-Imfolozi Park (South Africa, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Fiery-necked Nightjar live in Ruaha National Park?
Same genus: Caprimulgus
The closest relatives of the Fiery-necked Nightjar that you can see in Ruaha National Park (genus Caprimulgus, Old World Nightjars) are Square-tailed Nightjar (about 10%) and Freckled Nightjar (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Fiery-necked Nightjar sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Fiery-necked Nightjar is recorded against all the birds logged in Ruaha National Park (29 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.