What are the chances of seeing a Marsyas Hairstreak in Serra dos Órgãos National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Marsyas Hairstreak sighting in Serra dos Órgãos National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 83rd most-seen of the 117 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Marsyas Hairstreak in Serra dos Órgãos National Park?
March–April, June and November–December
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Marsyas Hairstreak in Serra dos Órgãos National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January–February, May and July–October, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Marsyas Hairstreak?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Marsyas Hairstreak sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Serra dos Órgãos National Park the best place to see a Marsyas Hairstreak?
Among the best
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Marsyas Hairstreak sightings, Serra dos Órgãos National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Main Ridge Forest Reserve (Trinidad and Tobago, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Marsyas Hairstreak live in Serra dos Órgãos National Park?
Same family: Lycaenidae
The closest relatives of the Marsyas Hairstreak that you can see in Serra dos Órgãos National Park (family Lycaenidae, Gossamer-winged Butterflies) are Pale-Clubbed Hairstreak (about 10%), Thecla celmus (about 10%) and Lycaena cyna (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Marsyas Hairstreak sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Marsyas Hairstreak is recorded against all the insects logged in Serra dos Órgãos National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.