What are the chances of seeing a Red-capped Cardinal in Sierra de la Macarena National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Red-capped Cardinal sighting in Sierra de la Macarena National Park on a given day, based on 17 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 299th most-seen of the 418 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Red-capped Cardinal in Sierra de la Macarena National Park?
March
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Red-capped Cardinal in Sierra de la Macarena National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April to February, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Red-capped Cardinal?
Between 3 and 6 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Red-capped Cardinal sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Sierra de la Macarena National Park the best place to see a Red-capped Cardinal?
7th of 8
Of the 8 parks where we can rate Red-capped Cardinal sightings, Sierra de la Macarena National Park ranks 7th at under 5%. The best odds are in Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve (Ecuador, about 60%), Manu National Park (Peru, about 40%) and Yasuní National Park (Ecuador, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Red-capped Cardinal live in Sierra de la Macarena National Park?
Same family: Thraupidae
The closest relatives of the Red-capped Cardinal that you can see in Sierra de la Macarena National Park (family Thraupidae, Tanagers and Allies) are Palm Tanager (about 50%), Blue-gray Tanager (about 40%) and Silver-beaked Tanager (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Red-capped Cardinal sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Red-capped Cardinal is recorded against all the birds logged in Sierra de la Macarena National Park (17 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.