What are the chances of seeing a Dark Apricot Sulphur in Soberanía National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Dark Apricot Sulphur sighting in Soberanía National Park on a given day, based on 9 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 129th most-seen of the 253 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Dark Apricot Sulphur in Soberanía National Park?
August
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Dark Apricot Sulphur in Soberanía National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March–April and September–January, the lowest months. That is one of Soberanía National Park's wettest months, with about 320 mm of rain against 25 mm in February.
What time of day is best to see a Dark Apricot Sulphur?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Dark Apricot Sulphur sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Soberanía National Park the best place to see a Dark Apricot Sulphur?
9th of 10
Of the 10 parks where we can rate Dark Apricot Sulphur sightings, Soberanía National Park ranks 9th at about 10%. The best odds are in Iguazú National Park (Argentina, about 30%), Iguaçu National Park (Brazil, about 20%) and Braulio Carrillo National Park (Costa Rica, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Dark Apricot Sulphur live in Soberanía National Park?
Same genus: Phoebis
The closest relatives of the Dark Apricot Sulphur that you can see in Soberanía National Park (genus Phoebis) are Orange-Barred Sulphur (about 10%) and Straight-Lined Sulphur (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Dark Apricot Sulphur sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Dark Apricot Sulphur is recorded against all the insects logged in Soberanía National Park (9 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.