What are the chances of seeing a Red-necked Francolin in Tarangire National Park?
Very likely
About 70% of wildlife watchers report a Red-necked Francolin sighting in Tarangire National Park on a given day, based on 1,063 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 13th most-seen of the 411 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Red-necked Francolin in Tarangire National Park?
March
In that month about 90% of wildlife watchers report a Red-necked Francolin in Tarangire National Park on a given day, against about 30% in August, the lowest month. That is one of Tarangire National Park's wettest months, with about 110 mm of rain against almost none in September.
What time of day is best to see a Red-necked Francolin?
Between 1 and 4 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Red-necked Francolin sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Tarangire National Park the best place to see a Red-necked Francolin?
2nd of 22
Of the 22 parks where we can rate Red-necked Francolin sightings, Tarangire National Park ranks 2nd at about 70%. The best odds are in Ruaha National Park (Tanzania, about 80%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Red-necked Francolin live in Tarangire National Park?
Same genus: Pternistis
The closest relatives of the Red-necked Francolin that you can see in Tarangire National Park (genus Pternistis, African Spurfowl) are Yellow-necked Francolin (about 70%) and Hildebrandt's Francolin (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Red-necked Francolin sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Red-necked Francolin is recorded against all the birds logged in Tarangire National Park (1,063 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.