What are the chances of seeing a Pachylia syces in Tijuca National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Pachylia syces sighting in Tijuca National Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 76th most-seen of the 132 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Pachylia syces in Tijuca National Park?
May, October and December–February
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Pachylia syces in Tijuca National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March–April, June–September and November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Pachylia syces?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Pachylia syces sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Tijuca National Park the best place to see a Pachylia syces?
Among the best
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Pachylia syces sightings, Tijuca National Park ranks 4th at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Bahía de Loreto National Park (Mexico, about 10%), Calakmul Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 10%) and Braulio Carrillo National Park (Costa Rica, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Pachylia syces live in Tijuca National Park?
Same family: Sphingidae
The closest relatives of the Pachylia syces that you can see in Tijuca National Park (family Sphingidae, Sphinx Moths) are Isognathus caricae (about 10%), Tetrio Sphinx (about 10%) and Streaked Sphinx (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Pachylia syces sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Pachylia syces is recorded against all the insects logged in Tijuca National Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.