What are the chances of seeing a White Peacock in Tijuca National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a White Peacock sighting in Tijuca National Park on a given day, based on 85 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 2nd most-seen of the 132 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a White Peacock in Tijuca National Park?
February
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a White Peacock in Tijuca National Park on a given day, against about 10% in June to August, the lowest months. That is one of Tijuca National Park's wettest months, with about 170 mm of rain against 40 mm in July.
What time of day is best to see a White Peacock?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most White Peacock sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Tijuca National Park the best place to see a White Peacock?
27th of 52
Of the 52 parks where we can rate White Peacock sightings, Tijuca National Park ranks 27th at about 20%. The best odds are in Los Haitises National Park (Dominican Republic, about 50%), Big Cypress National Preserve (United States, about 40%) and Everglades National Park (United States, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the White Peacock live in Tijuca National Park?
Same family: Nymphalidae
The closest relatives of the White Peacock that you can see in Tijuca National Park (family Nymphalidae, Brush-footed Butterflies) are Julia Heliconian (about 10%), Melinaea ludovica (about 10%) and Malachite (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the White Peacock sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the White Peacock is recorded against all the insects logged in Tijuca National Park (85 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.