What are the chances of seeing a Starry Night Cracker in Tijuca National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Starry Night Cracker sighting in Tijuca National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 66th most-seen of the 132 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Starry Night Cracker in Tijuca National Park?
March, May–July and September
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Starry Night Cracker in Tijuca National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April, August and October–February, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Starry Night Cracker?
Between 1 and 4 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Starry Night Cracker sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Tijuca National Park the best place to see a Starry Night Cracker?
5th of 6
Of the 6 parks where we can rate Starry Night Cracker sightings, Tijuca National Park ranks 5th at about 10%. The best odds are in Pico Bonito National Park (Honduras, about 30%), Cerro Azul Meámbar National Park (Honduras, about 20%) and Chapada Diamantina National Park (Brazil, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Starry Night Cracker live in Tijuca National Park?
Same genus: Hamadryas
The closest relatives of the Starry Night Cracker that you can see in Tijuca National Park (genus Hamadryas, Cracker Butterflies) are Arete Cracker (about 10%) and Red Cracker (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Starry Night Cracker sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Starry Night Cracker is recorded against all the insects logged in Tijuca National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.