What are the chances of seeing a Plum-headed Parakeet in Udawalawe National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Plum-headed Parakeet sighting in Udawalawe National Park on a given day, based on 100 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 83rd most-seen of the 166 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Plum-headed Parakeet in Udawalawe National Park?
March
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Plum-headed Parakeet in Udawalawe National Park on a given day, against about 10% in May, August and December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Plum-headed Parakeet?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Plum-headed Parakeet sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Udawalawe National Park the best place to see a Plum-headed Parakeet?
13th of 17
Of the 17 parks where we can rate Plum-headed Parakeet sightings, Udawalawe National Park ranks 13th at about 20%. The best odds are in Bandhavgarh National Park (India, about 70%), Mudumalai National Park (India, about 60%) and Satpura National Park (India, about 60%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Plum-headed Parakeet live in Udawalawe National Park?
Same genus: Psittacula
The closest relatives of the Plum-headed Parakeet that you can see in Udawalawe National Park (genus Psittacula, Old World Parakeets) are Rose-ringed Parakeet (about 70%) and Alexandrine Parakeet (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Plum-headed Parakeet sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Plum-headed Parakeet is recorded against all the birds logged in Udawalawe National Park (100 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.