What are the chances of seeing an Amazonian Motmot in Anavilhanas National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report an Amazonian Motmot sighting in Anavilhanas National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 275th most-seen of the 291 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Amazonian Motmot in Anavilhanas National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report an Amazonian Motmot in Anavilhanas National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see an Amazonian Motmot?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Amazonian Motmot sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Anavilhanas National Park the best place to see an Amazonian Motmot?
10th of 11
Of the 11 parks where we can rate Amazonian Motmot sightings, Anavilhanas National Park ranks 10th at under 5%. The best odds are in Amboró National Park (Bolivia, about 40%), Tambopata National Reserve (Peru, about 30%) and Sierra de la Macarena National Park (Colombia, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Amazonian Motmot live in Anavilhanas National Park?
Same order: Coraciiformes
The closest relatives of the Amazonian Motmot that you can see in Anavilhanas National Park (order Coraciiformes, Rollers, Kingfishers, and Allies) are Ringed Kingfisher (about 50%), Amazon Kingfisher (about 40%) and Green Kingfisher (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Amazonian Motmot sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Amazonian Motmot is recorded against all the birds logged in Anavilhanas National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.