What are the chances of seeing a Jungle Nightjar in Bandhavgarh National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Jungle Nightjar sighting in Bandhavgarh National Park on a given day, based on 160 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 107th most-seen of the 241 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Jungle Nightjar in Bandhavgarh National Park?
May
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Jungle Nightjar in Bandhavgarh National Park on a given day, against under 5% in July, September–October and December–February, the lowest months. That is one of Bandhavgarh National Park's driest months, with about 10 mm of rain against 400 mm in August.
What time of day is best to see a Jungle Nightjar?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Jungle Nightjar sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Bandhavgarh National Park the best place to see a Jungle Nightjar?
4th of 12
Of the 12 parks where we can rate Jungle Nightjar sightings, Bandhavgarh National Park ranks 4th at about 10%. The best odds are in Mudumalai National Park (India, about 20%), Keoladeo National Park (India, about 10%) and Gir National Park (India, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Jungle Nightjar live in Bandhavgarh National Park?
Same genus: Caprimulgus
The closest relatives of the Jungle Nightjar that you can see in Bandhavgarh National Park (genus Caprimulgus, Old World Nightjars) are Indian Nightjar (about 10%) and Savanna Nightjar (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Jungle Nightjar sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Jungle Nightjar is recorded against all the birds logged in Bandhavgarh National Park (160 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.