What are the chances of seeing a Barred Parakeet in Celaque National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Barred Parakeet sighting in Celaque National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 183rd most-seen of the 193 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Barred Parakeet in Celaque National Park?
January and May
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Barred Parakeet in Celaque National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–April and June–December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Barred Parakeet?
Between 3 and 6 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Barred Parakeet sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Celaque National Park the best place to see a Barred Parakeet?
9th of 15
Of the 15 parks where we can rate Barred Parakeet sightings, Celaque National Park ranks 9th at under 5%. The best odds are in Volcán Barú National Park (Panama, about 10%), Tapantí-Macizo de la Muerte National Park (Costa Rica, about 10%) and Los Quetzales National Park (Costa Rica, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Barred Parakeet live in Celaque National Park?
Same family: Psittacidae
The closest relatives of the Barred Parakeet that you can see in Celaque National Park (family Psittacidae, New World and African Parrots) are Scarlet Macaw (about 20%), Green Parakeet (about 10%) and White-fronted Parrot (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Barred Parakeet sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Barred Parakeet is recorded against all the birds logged in Celaque National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.