What are the chances of seeing a Marbled Godwit in Celestún Biosphere Reserve?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Marbled Godwit sighting in Celestún Biosphere Reserve on a given day, based on 21 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 223rd most-seen of the 297 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Marbled Godwit in Celestún Biosphere Reserve?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Marbled Godwit in Celestún Biosphere Reserve on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Marbled Godwit?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Marbled Godwit sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Celestún Biosphere Reserve the best place to see a Marbled Godwit?
10th of 15
Of the 15 parks where we can rate Marbled Godwit sightings, Celestún Biosphere Reserve ranks 10th at under 5%. The best odds are in El Vizcaíno Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 50%), Ría Lagartos Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 20%) and Bahía de Loreto National Park (Mexico, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Marbled Godwit live in Celestún Biosphere Reserve?
Same family: Scolopacidae
The closest relatives of the Marbled Godwit that you can see in Celestún Biosphere Reserve (family Scolopacidae, Sandpipers and Allies) are Willet (about 40%), Spotted Sandpiper (about 40%) and Least Sandpiper (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Marbled Godwit sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Marbled Godwit is recorded against all the birds logged in Celestún Biosphere Reserve (21 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.