What are the chances of seeing a Solitary Sandpiper in Celestún Biosphere Reserve?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Solitary Sandpiper sighting in Celestún Biosphere Reserve on a given day, based on 66 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 155th most-seen of the 297 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Solitary Sandpiper in Celestún Biosphere Reserve?
January, April–May and September
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Solitary Sandpiper in Celestún Biosphere Reserve on a given day, against under 5% in February–March, June–August and October–December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Solitary Sandpiper?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Solitary Sandpiper sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Celestún Biosphere Reserve the best place to see a Solitary Sandpiper?
19th of 71
Of the 71 parks where we can rate Solitary Sandpiper sightings, Celestún Biosphere Reserve ranks 19th at under 5%. The best odds are in Wrangell-St. Elias National Park (United States, about 20%), Caroni Swamp (Trinidad and Tobago, about 20%) and Elk Island National Park (Canada, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Solitary Sandpiper live in Celestún Biosphere Reserve?
Same genus: Tringa
The closest relatives of the Solitary Sandpiper that you can see in Celestún Biosphere Reserve (genus Tringa, Shanks, Tattlers, and Allies) are Willet (about 40%), Lesser Yellowlegs (about 20%) and Greater Yellowlegs (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Solitary Sandpiper sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Solitary Sandpiper is recorded against all the birds logged in Celestún Biosphere Reserve (66 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.