What are the chances of seeing a Greater Yellowlegs in Celestún Biosphere Reserve?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Greater Yellowlegs sighting in Celestún Biosphere Reserve on a given day, based on 302 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 75th most-seen of the 297 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Greater Yellowlegs in Celestún Biosphere Reserve?
November
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Greater Yellowlegs in Celestún Biosphere Reserve on a given day, against under 5% in June and July, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Greater Yellowlegs?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Greater Yellowlegs sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Celestún Biosphere Reserve the best place to see a Greater Yellowlegs?
12th of 72
Of the 72 parks where we can rate Greater Yellowlegs sightings, Celestún Biosphere Reserve ranks 12th at about 20%. The best odds are in Katmai National Park (United States, about 60%), El Vizcaíno Biosphere Reserve (Mexico, about 40%) and Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge (United States, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Greater Yellowlegs live in Celestún Biosphere Reserve?
Same genus: Tringa
The closest relatives of the Greater Yellowlegs that you can see in Celestún Biosphere Reserve (genus Tringa, Shanks, Tattlers, and Allies) are Willet (about 40%) and Lesser Yellowlegs (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Greater Yellowlegs sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Greater Yellowlegs is recorded against all the birds logged in Celestún Biosphere Reserve (302 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.